Bitcoin And The Electronic Frontier Foundation

Anon Mus my.green.lantern at googlemail.com
Tue Nov 16 05:07:05 PST 2010


Kyle Williams wrote:
> Coderman sent this to me, and I'm a little upset because the extra  
> $60.00/month for 0 bitcoins is very annoying.  I have since stopped  
> trying to generate bitcoins, because it's just wasting electricity.  
> More comment inline below debating this point.
>
>
> For those who are wondering if it's worth trying to generate bitcoins,  
> here is something to think about.
> I've had a single Quad-Core (2.6GHz/core, 12MB L2 cache) server  
> crunching on bitcoins for about 6 months now.  About 2-3 months ago, it 
> stopped generating bitcoins.
> Someone is out there with a lot of GPU's, crunching away at the bitcoin 
> network and is hording/generating all the bitcoins.  I say this because 
> the amount of chatter on the bitcoin forums in regards to GPUs vs CPUs 
> has exploded, and new GPU clients are being released.
>
>
>     ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>     From: Jeffrey Paul <sneak at datavibe.net <mailto:sneak at datavibe.net>>
>     Date: Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:22 AM
>     Subject: Re: Bitcoin And The Electronic Frontier Foundation
>     To: coderman <coderman at gmail.com <mailto:coderman at gmail.com>>
>     Cc: Sarad AV <jtrjtrjtr2001 at yahoo.com
>     <mailto:jtrjtrjtr2001 at yahoo.com>>, Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org
>     <mailto:eugen at leitl.org>>,
>     cypherpunks at al-qaeda.net <mailto:cypherpunks at al-qaeda.net>
>
>
>     -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>     Hash: SHA256
>
>
>     On 15 Nov, 2010, at 19:19 , coderman wrote:
>
>     >
>     > the cuda cards are killing bitcoin, why bother?
>     >
>     >   (i suppose it is an interesting footnote...)
>
>
>
>     Nothing could be further from the truth.  Mining/Minting operations
>     have little/nothing to do with the viability of the network itself.
>
>
> That's correct, it has to do with the number of operations per second  
> you CPU/GPU can do.  The network is based on the number of supporters.  
> Apple's and oranges.  
>
>     It's a novel way of dealing with inflation, but, if anything, the easy
>     availability of cheap and fast GPUs is accelerating adoption.
>
>
> You're twisting facts together here, again apple's and orange's.   
> Inflation aside, GPUs will generate bitcoins much, much faster than a  
> CPU. 
>
>      
>
>     Opportunists will quickly drive the profit from generating down to
>     almost exactly that of the power costs, but that's to be expected.
>
>
> No, the value of bitcoins starts to be cut in half as the more bitcoins 
> are generated.
>
> "The number of blocks times the coin value of a block. The coin value  
> is 50 bc per block for the first 210,000 blocks, 25 bc for the next  
> 210,000 blocks, then 12.5 bc, 6.25 bc and so on." -- 
> http://www.bitcoin.org/faq#What-s_the_current_total_amount_of_Bitcoins_in_existence
>
> So when the value of BTC's starts to be cut in half, and with INFLATION 
> now at a record high, the cost of electricity is NOT GOING DOWN.
> Hence, the chance of you generating bitcoins will go down because a CPU 
> can not compete with someone else's GPU, more power/electricity is  
> being used to generate (or not generate) bitcoins, and after the last  
> six month's of running bitcoin, I haven't generated a single block in  
> over two months because someone has already cornered this market with  
> GPU's.
>
>     They are also the driving force behind a free market.  Or do you think
>     they are killing those, too? :)
>
>
> Of course someone quotes the "free market" when they have a large  
> corner of it.  Free market's always FAIL when someone is hording all  
> the (bit)coins, and while it may support free market's, it certainly is 
> not a fair market today.  If 2,000,000 bitcoins are spread about a few 
> thousand people, and 19,000,000 coins are held by 1 person, your "Free 
> Market" goes down the drain because one person could out-buy anyone 
> else.
>
> One last point; by looking @ the #bitcoin channel on IRC, it shows that 
> about 600 people are wasting their CPU cycles because someone has most 
> likely has a cluster of GPU's working away at this.  This is the wasted 
> cost of TRYING to generate a bitcoin.  If only one person can generate 
> the block (ie, 50 Bitcoins right now), then 599 people are wasting their 
> electricity and time.  So the ~$60 a month (increase in my electric 
> bill) * 599 = $35,940.  Even if we decide to be really conservative (not 
> realistic in this case) and cut this cost down by a tenth, it's still 
> ~$3,594 being wasted per month while someone else get's the coins.  How 
> "green" or "eco-friendly" is that?
>
> Now I ask the community, If your chance of generating a bitcoin block  
> for yourself is slim-to-none,  would you want to waste your time and  
> money trying to generate bitcoins?
>
> Don't get me wrong, I hate what is happening to the USD, and love the  
> idea of crypto currency, but I see some serious flaws with bitcoin.  He 
> who has the biggest cluster will win the day, and leaves the rest of us 
> with next to nothing.
>
> - Kyle
A few months ago I saw this as well using a dual core 2.666, but I found a 
little trick which increases the coin production. Just re-boot every 2-3 
days, then you usually get a flush of coins.

At the time I considered getting an i7, just out, which has on chip  
hardwired encryption circuits. Its lightning fast on generating the hashes 
and even half a dozen of these were generating bitcoins then anyone with 
lesser technology doesn't stand a chance.

http://www.intel.com/products/processor/corei7/index.htm

It sounds to me like these are now being used. Time to upgrade. It would  
be interesting if anyone had experience of using the i7.

On the question of cost. If you have a machine which already has to run  
24/7 (say a Tor node) then the extra cost of max CPU usage is about  
$5-15/mo. (My dual core costs about $15/mo without bitcoin)



***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo at torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list