[p2p-hackers] Alpha testers needed
iang at iang.org
Fri Jun 18 22:38:49 PDT 2010
On 18/06/10 12:27 PM, Serguei Osokine wrote:
> In fact, I thought that this was exactly the hint that Zooko was
> dropping with his question about MN history. Was kind of surprised
> to read all the serious history descriptions that followed - though
> enjoyed them anyway... :)
:) Maybe to add to your surprise, there was a serious history! Perhaps
a little more background will help.
In the late 1980s, a guy called David Chaum invented a cryptographic
form of cash which he called digital cash. His invention was a
variation of the RSA formula that allowed a transfer of something from
one person to another, that a third party could prove as valid, but not
track the transfer. This allowed the third party to be an issuer of
value, and users to transfer coins without being traced.
David was a privacy guy and worked out somehow that the future of the
planet depended on robust but private exchange of goods for cash. He
saw the bank and the government as the greatest threats to people in
their breach of privacy. The basic threat is that if the crooks,
governments or banks know where the value is, they won't be able to keep
their hands off it for long.
David started a company called DigiCash in Amsterdam which built a
system of digital cash (of course) and then in around 1994 he started
trying to sell it to banks as the latest hot Internet invention. From a
PR point of view, he succeeded dramatically; more was written about the
invention of digital cash than practically any other thing with perhaps
the sole exception of Netscape.
Which intersected with a large community of anarchists / libertarians /
privacy nuts called the cypherpunks. So around 1995 there was an
explosion of interest in money systems, wherein money was seen as the
solution to every problem. This interest rumbled on, with hundreds of
startups taking on different perspectives until 2 events knocked the fun
out of the game (2000 dotcom crash and 911).
Now, just about that time, as the money business was being rewired in
some post-fun image by dotbomb+911, Napster started up and showed a new
model. So a natural shift occurred as people started looking at the p2p
market as the solution space.
MN was one of those. The thing to understand though is that the people
in MN all came from the earlier generation. Zooko worked for DigiCash
and Jim was a cypherpunk, I guess. Well, we all were in some sense, I
So, that generation saw money as the solution. This generation sees p2p
collaboration as the solution. Who's right? Who's wrong?
It all depends on your assumptions. Economics will tell you that the
money guys are right if there is a scarce resource, and/or the resource
is worth real value. But, if not, then collaboration can be done if we
can find the sweet spot. Now, it's rather difficult to predict how any
particular problem plays out, but it is somewhat easier to say this: if
the system is valuable, it will eventually have value. To steal. And
if not, maybe we're wasting our time?
So, in such a system, money might solve the accounting of trades of
value, but that's not a guarantee -- money is very tricky stuff to get
right, and there is plenty of merit in leaving that part to the end.
Which is kind of what Jim was getting at: MN tried to solve too much.
Out of it came some successes, but they were cut-down, like BitTorrent
and Tahoe. As time goes on, more value finds its way into these
successes, and the call to add in a money gets louder.
Caveat: I was an observer of those efforts, of the things mentioned
above, so corrections from the insiders can be expected!
p2p-hackers mailing list
p2p-hackers at lists.zooko.com
----- End forwarded message -----
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy