managing and protecting nyms...

Sarad AV jtrjtrjtr2001 at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 8 11:14:22 PST 2009


--- On Sun, 11/8/09, John Young <jya at pipeline.com> wrote:

> From: John Young <jya at pipeline.com>
> Subject: Re: managing and protecting nyms...
> To: cypherpunks at al-qaeda.net
> Date: Sunday, November 8, 2009, 11:01 PM
> Peer review is necessary to assure
> blunders are not overlooked.
> However, there has been no demonstration that peer review
> is all
> that is needed for the superior protection. This is not an
> argument
> for obscurity, only a caution that peer review is not
> necessary
> sufficient. Peers miss stuff too, as amply demonstrated by
> holes
> and bad implementation later discovered.


Since it is discovered later, isn't that called peer review?
 
Sarad.





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list