Private Homes may be taken for public good

[Jay Listo]

Well, once the Supreme Court starts coming up with stuff like this, you 
know you've been Bush-whacked.

J.A. Terranson wrote:

>On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Tyler Durden wrote:
>
>  
>
>>What this equates to is, whoever had more money than you can take away your
>>home. Previously, it was just the occasional men-with-guns that could do
>>this, but now they effectively have proxies everywhere.
>>    
>>
>
>It just makes formal (and official) what has existed for a long time.  The
>guy with the most money can do whatever the fuck s/he wants to, with no
>regard to any rule of law or social responsibility, and there isn't anyone
>who wants to change that.
>
>After all, if we really wanted to change it, it wouldn't be just four or
>five cpunks bitching on a now obsolete mailing list - it would be citizens
>with guns storming the halls of congresscritters.