Private Homes may be taken for public good

[Tyler Durden]

Yeah, but this steps crosses a line, I think. Before, your home could be 
taken for a public project. Now, the supreme court has ruled that your home 
can be taken for a "public project" that consists entirely of private 
development, in the name of the "public good", which is supposed to equal 
higher tax revenues.

What this equates to is, whoever had more money than you can take away your 
home. Previously, it was just the occasional men-with-guns that could do 
this, but now they effectively have proxies everywhere.

-TD

>From: "A.Melon" <juicy at melontraffickers.com>
>To: cypherpunks at jfet.org
>Subject: Re: Private Homes may be taken for public good
>Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > How do you take out a bulldozer? (Remember, bulldozer operators can
> > easily be replaced.)
>thermite through the engine block, frag bomb in the engine compartment,
>torch any remaining hoses, slice the tires, puncture the brake lines.
>you don't need someone to tell you this. takings clause abuse has been
>going on for a long time.