What is a cypherpunk?
steve49152 at yahoo.ca
Wed Feb 16 12:45:06 PST 2005
--- Justin <justin-cypherpunks at soze.net> wrote:
> On 2005-02-16T13:31:14-0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
> > --- "R.A. Hettinga" <rah at shipwright.com> wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > Property is like rights. We create it inherently, because we're
> > > it
> > > is not bestowed upon us by someone else. Particularly if that
> > > is
> > > stolen from someone else at tax-time.
> > But as long as property rights are generally considered to be a tenet
> > characteristic of society, excuses for officiated theft, for instance,
> > merely put a veneer of legitimacy over certain kinds of theft. I
> > that RMS will ever be framed, arrested and thrown in to the gulag, his
> > property confiscated; but for someone like myself, that is certainly
> > option, eh?
> Is there a difference between property rights in a society like a pride
> of lions, and property rights that are respected independent of social
> status? Or are they essentially the same? They seem to be different,
> but I can't articulate why. Obviously the latter needs enforcement,
> possibly courts, etc., but I can't identify a more innate difference,
> other than simply as I described it -- property rights depending on
> social status, and property rights not depending on social status.
> I don't think any society has ever managed to construct a pure property
> rights system where nobody has any advantage. Without government it's
> the strong. With government, government agents have an advantage, and
> rich people have an advantage because they can hire smart lawyers to get
> unfair court decisions. So maybe this is just silly, in which case I
> believe even more strongly that formal status-independent property
> rights are not the basis of government.
Whatever. See the sentence I wrote last in my previous message.
When you grow the fuck up, drop me a line.
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy