worth reading -- loophole in FISA?
revers at evers.org
Sat Dec 24 12:25:40 PST 2005
David Reed is right on the money in terms of the false positive issue.
Actually, the "more hay" methodology has been shown to be ineffective in
other, related fields, and even worse has been shown to be an
for _evading_ detection.
Simply put, it is relatively easy for an attacker to determine the
things that trigger alerts, and to flood the detection system with those
types of events. Intrustion detection systems on networks are
in point: they are so overwhelmeed by false positives that in very short
order the people monitoring the systems stop paying attention. A
cried wolf" problem, exacerbated by the fact that the marginal cost of
creating a false positive is many orders of magnitude less than the
responsing to one.
Ultimately, the IDS systems end up being used either (a) to show
management that "we're doing something", and/or (b) as part of the
process _after_ a breach has occurred to try to see if the attacker
useful footprints (hint: the answer is "no").
There's a trend to watch for, as well. The follow-on technology to IDS,
optimistically referred to as Intrusion Prevention Systems, has been
as a tool to actually stop attacks in progress. Essentially, it's a
combination of detection capability coupled with 'drop the connection'
capability. It came into existence because security people thought
be cool, and because customers were complaining about the overload on
resources that the IDS technologies imposed. The theory was that
could operate with sufficient speed to prevent bad things from
The real world response (as noted in a recent Network World review of
has been that the systems are getting deployed, but without the 'P'
enabled. It seems that users are not willing to take the risk of
off a good connection (the 99.9999% case) in order to prevent an
But I expect that the next layer of proposals out of the NSA data mining
mess will be to create and deploy some magic system that can operate
speed of the technology being monitored.
<Insert massive (unsuccessful) budget here.>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Ben Franklin, ~1784
From: David Farber [mailto:dave at farber.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 3:40 PM
To: Ip Ip
Subject: worth reading -- loophole in FISA?
Begin forwarded message:
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy