Geopolitical Darwin Awards
James A. Donald
jamesd at echeque.com
Sun Sep 19 16:57:41 PDT 2004
On 19 Sep 2004 at 12:15, Tyler Durden wrote:
> My running, personal theory is that Muslim fundamentalism (and in
> general, most fundamentalisms) get going when the locals gain a
> persistent sense that they're gettin' screwed over,
But the Saudi Arabian elite, of among which Bin Laden was born with a
silver spoon in his mouth, are not getting screwed over.
Similarly, the Javanese are not get screwed over. In an entirely
literal sense, they are doing the screwing, in that boys and girls
among racial and religious minorities subject to their power tend to
get raped, and the rapists and murderers go unpunished.
Secondly, these guys are no more fundamentalists than the World
Council of Churches, or liberation theologians, whose views strongly
resemble those of the terrorists, are fundamentalists. They tend to
talk about Islam overthrowing Capitalism, a proposition that would
have seemed wholly bizarre to Mohammed, who talked about Islam
overthrowing Christendom.
A christian fundamentalist believes he bases his religion on Christ
and the twelve Apostles. The terrorists do not believe they base
their religion upon Mohammed and the four rightly guided Caliphs.
Rather they base their religion on much later authority. Bin Laden
even claims the Turkish Calphate represented proper religious
authority, a view that is extremely whacky among Muslims. The views
of many of the terrorists have a resemblance to those of caliph al-
Hakim, holds that living theological authority is supreme, and
casually rewrite the positions of dead theological authority - a
position whose Christian equivalent is analogous to "High Church",
which is generally regarded as the opposite of fundamentalist.
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list