Symantec labels China censor-busting software as Trojan

[Tyler Durden]

Hum, well, I always kind of thought May felt/wrote that some dis-assembly of 
the state was inevitable given the possibility of strong crypto, and even in 
China I would maintain that there's already enough computer power+anonymity 
that encrypted communications can/will occur. (Remember, China is BIG...as 
big as the mainland US plus Alaska, and much of it far less accessible...and 
let's not forget that there are areas the size of Western Europe where Han 
dominance is not particularly appreciated.) I tend to agree, though that the 
bootstrapping process can be greatly retarded in the presence of a heavy 
police state....but above a certain threshold it can unfold quickly.

What I wonder if whether W and his buddies were up late drinkin' one night 
and figured out that we were nearing the threshold you speak of, a threshold 
they believed they had to save humanity from. I mean, what if just anyone 
could send any message they wanted without their government listening in? 
Someone's gotta be in charge, after all, and it better be us and not the 
ragheads 'cause God loves US and plans on sending all of them to hell unless 
they see the error of their distinctly non-American ways.

-TD


>From: "Major Variola (ret)" <mv at cdc.gov>
>To: "cypherpunks at al-qaeda.net" <cypherpunks at al-qaeda.net>
>Subject: RE: Symantec labels China censor-busting software as Trojan
>Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:45:00 -0700
>
>At 09:45 AM 9/15/04 -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
> >Hum. Seems the Chinese government is pretty effective at
>self-preservation.
> >Does this contradict the widely-held Cypherpunk belief in the
>inevitability
> >of deterioration of the state?
>
>"We" have always held that a sufficiently policed state can defeat
>crypto.
>If the RIAA could put a vidcam in your computer room, things are easy.
>If crypto is illegal, things are easy.  (We have remarked on how,
>modulo stego, crypto traffic is trivial to detect with any entropy
>measure.  Got PGP headers?)
>
>China is a police state.  A state with freedom of expression ---which
>does
>not include much or all of Europe--- is less so.   China is also a
>nukepower,
>so it is likely to persist.

_________________________________________________________________
Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to 
School Guide! http://special.msn.com/network/04backtoschool.armx