US Retardation of Free Markets (was Airport insanity)

[J.A. Terranson]

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:

> > McViegh did not target innocents.  Bin Laden did target
> > innocents.
>
> I'm confused.

So is Mr. Donald.

>  Is Mr. Donald saying McVeigh did not surveil his target
> sufficiently to know that there was a day care center in the damage
> pattern?  Or is he saying it only takes one "non-innocent" in a damage
> zone to justify an attack? (in which case, how is he privy to Bin
> Laden's attack plan, such that he can rule out any "non-innocent"
> targets)

No, Mr. Donald is demonstrating irrational thought processes.

You see, McVeigh isn't a terrorist because he had purity of purpose.  But
Bin Laden IS a terrorist because he had purity of purpose.

-- 
Yours,

J.A. Terranson
sysadmin at mfn.org
0xBD4A95BF

	"An ill wind is stalking
	while evil stars whir
	and all the gold apples
	go bad to the core"

	S. Plath, Temper of Time