Airport insanity
Sunder
sunder at sunder.net
Thu Oct 21 10:41:55 PDT 2004
No you imbecile, I'm telling no one anything, other than you to get a
clue. Where did I tell people who are under attack to suck it up?
All I did was point out that you weren't there and therefore any comment
you care to make about it is bound to be flawed.
Please find yourself a clue store and open your wallet - wide.
----------------------Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---------------------------
+ ^ + :"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. /|\
\|/ :They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country /\|/\
<--*-->:and our people, and neither do we." -G. W. Bush, 2004.08.05 \/|\/
/|\ : \|/
+ v + : War is Peace, freedom is slavery, Bush is President.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, James A. Donald wrote:
> --
> On 21 Oct 2004 at 10:26, Sunder wrote:
> > IMHO, you are a misguided armchair general who sees yourself
> > as equal to those scumbags that have risen in power to lead
> > or enslave nations since you seem to constantly say "they
> > should have done X, and not Y"
>
> When people are under attack, you cannot tell them to suck it
> up, which is what you are doing. If we had no government, we
> might well be doing pogroms against american muslims - and a
> good thing to.
>
> War causes governments, and causes governments to gain power,
> but the US government was not the aggressor in this war. US
> government meddling in the middle east was unwise and
> unnecessary, but it did not provoke, nor does it justify, this
> war.
>
> The intent of a large minority of muslims was to start a holy
> war between the west and Islam, and the majority of muslims
> lack the will or courage to stop them, or even criticize them.
> That was not the intent of Americans, or the American
> government. They started it, they meant to start it. Americans
> tried to avoid it, some of them are still trying to avoid it.
> All Americans are still trying to conduct the war on the
> smallest possible scale, against the smallest possible subset
> of Islam, disagreeing only on how small that subset can be.
>
> --digsig
> James A. Donald
> 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
> YeXgmiDN23gKNejAXLPSgfGxzFPVqFa/9pEDbWNr
> 41sYVdSvXQCEQniQVEIYWhWw2HjtvpvuHtQ0QXUaI
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list