Airline ID requirement faces legal challenge

[Tyler Durden]

Actually, this story is quite the media bellweather. This one treats the 
case purely as "Gilmore wants to fly anonymously", while even some other 
mainline media are reporting it as, "Gilmore is questioning the legality of 
hidden laws".

I guess USA Today still feels it has an audience worth pandering to.

-TD




>From: "R.A. Hettinga" <rah at shipwright.com>
>To: cypherpunks at al-qaeda.net, cryptography at metzdowd.com
>Subject: Airline ID requirement faces legal challenge
>Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:15:53 -0400
>
><http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/surveillance/2004-10-10-privacy_x.htm>
>
>USA Today
>
>
>
>Airline ID requirement faces legal challenge
>By Richard Willing, USA TODAY
>At a time when Americans have come to expect tight security for air travel,
>it might seem to be an odd question: Does requiring airline passengers to
>show identification before they board domestic flights amount to an
>"unreasonable search" under the Constitution?
>
>John Gilmore is challenging the federal domestic airline ID requirement,
>saying it violates his right to travel in the USA anonymously.
>File photo
>
>Yes, says John Gilmore, a computer whiz who made a fortune as an early
>employee of Sun Microsystems. His challenge of the federal ID requirement,
>which soon could get a hearing before a U.S. appeals court in San
>Francisco, is one of the latest court battles to test the balance between
>security concerns and civil liberties.
>
>  At issue is Gilmore's claim that checking the IDs of passengers on
>domestic flights violates his right to travel throughout the USA
>anonymously, without the government monitoring him.
>
>  Lawyers involved in the case say it apparently is the first such 
>challenge
>to the federal rules that require airline passengers to provide
>identification. In a similar case, two peace activists are suing the U.S.
>government to determine how their names came to be placed on a federal
>"no-fly list." Rebecca Gordon and Janet Adams were not allowed to board a
>San Francisco to Boston flight in August 2002 after they were told that
>their names were on a "secret FBI" list of potential security threats,
>their court filing says.
>
>"I believe I have a right to travel in my own country without presenting
>what amounts to an internal passport," Gilmore, 49, said in an interview.
>"I have a right to be anonymous, (to not) be tracked by my government for
>no good reason."
>
>Gilmore said he has no problem with security checks that focus on
>passengers' luggage. He says he also does not object to having to present a
>passport to board flights to other countries.
>
>  Some privacy groups say Gilmore has a point. But others who support the 
>ID
>requirement have cast the San Francisco resident as being out of touch with
>the realities of air travel since the Sept. 11 attacks.
>
>Kent Scheidegger, counsel for the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, a
>conservative group in Sacramento, says the ID requirement is good policy
>and "eminently constitutional."
>
>"The Fourth Amendment forbids not searches that you don't like, it forbids
>unreasonable searches," he says. "Nothing could be more reasonable at this
>time than to know who you're flying with."
>
>  The Justice Department is fighting Gilmore's claim. Acting on the
>department's motion, a U.S. district court judge in San Francisco dismissed
>the suit last March. Gilmore has appealed; a hearing before the 9th Circuit
>Court of Appeals is likely to be scheduled after briefs are filed next
>month.
>
>In court papers, the Justice Department has not defended the ID policy, or
>even acknowledged it exists. It has said national security law requires
>that this aspect of the case be argued in a courtroom closed to the public,
>including Gilmore. The appeals court denied the government's secrecy
>request Sept. 20, and the government has asked the court to reconsider.
>
>  Rules on the Transportation Security Administration's Web site say
>passengers 18 and older need one form of government-issued photo
>identification or two forms of non-photo identification to board domestic
>flights.
>
>  Airlines adopted such a policy on their own after terrorists bombed an
>international flight over Lockerbie, Scotland, in December 1988. The bomb
>that killed all 270 passengers on the jet was said to have been placed in a
>passenger's luggage by a terrorist who got into a restricted area. The
>airlines say checking IDs against luggage and passenger information is a
>way to deny terrorists access to flights.
>
>The TSA, formed two years ago in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, checks
>IDs to verify passenger identities and to check them against "watch lists"
>of known or suspected terrorists.
>
>Gilmore's suit says the requirement amounts to an unreasonable search, a
>"burden" on the right to travel and a form of self-incrimination because it
>singles out "anonymous travelers" for searching.
>
>Gilmore said the ID requirement does little to ensure security. "Ordinary
>citizens may show correct identification, but do we really think that
>someone who is willing to commit a terrorist act won't also be willing to
>present false identification?"
>
>Gilmore's suit was filed in 2002, after he was denied seats on two flights
>at the airport in Oakland. It was his first domestic flight since the 9/11
>attacks. Before then, Gilmore said, he was permitted to board flights after
>presenting a Federal Aviation Administration document that said showing IDs
>was optional.
>
>In 1982, Gilmore, a computer programmer, was the first person hired by the
>founders of what became Sun Microsystems. He retired eight years ago with
>what his publicist, Bill Scannell, calls "multiples" of millions of 
>dollars.
>
>Since then, Gilmore said, he has worked to promote "individual rights," in
>part by sponsoring a foundation that is critical of travel restrictions and
>what he considers violations of speech and privacy rights.
>
>Last year, before taking off on a British Airways flight from San Francisco
>to London, Gilmore angered fellow travelers by refusing to remove a blue
>button on his lapel that had the words "suspected terrorist" imposed over
>the picture of an airliner. After a delay, the pilot went back to the gate
>and ordered Gilmore off the jet.
>
>While his case moves through court, Gilmore has remained grounded when it
>comes to domestic travel.
>
>He hired friends to drive him to San Diego and across the country to attend
>board meetings of corporate and non-profit groups. He took a driving
>vacation to Oregon. Invited to a family reunion in Massachusetts, he
>thought of chartering a private plane but balked at the $33,000 price.
>
>"Yes, it can be inconvenient at times," Gilmore said of his fight against
>the ID requirement. "But I believe I'm right."
>
>
>--
>-----------------
>R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah at ibuc.com>
>The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
>44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
>"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
>[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
>experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
hthttp://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/