Psst. President Bush Is Hard at Work Expanding Government Secrecy

[Tyler Durden]

"That said, I hereby confess to feeling disappointed over Senator John
Kerry's failure to home in hard on one of the more worrisome domestic
policy developments of the past four years - namely the Bush
administration's drastic expansion of needless government secrecy."

Come on! The bar slut has passed out on the pooltable and Bush's fratbrother 
Mr Kerry hasn't had his go yet...

-TD




>From: "R.A. Hettinga" <rah at shipwright.com>
>To: cypherpunks at al-qaeda.net, cryptography at metzdowd.com
>Subject: Psst. President Bush Is Hard at Work Expanding Government  Secrecy
>Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:37:28 -0400
>
><http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/01/opinion/01mon4.html?th=&pagewanted=print&position=>
>
>The New York Times
>
>November 1, 2004
>EDITORIAL OBSERVER
>
>Psst. President Bush Is Hard at Work Expanding Government Secrecy
>By DOROTHY SAMUELS
>
>t is only inevitable, I suppose, that some big issues never make it onto
>the agenda of a presidential campaign, and other lesser issues, or total
>nonissues, somehow emerge instead. Electoral politics, as Americans are
>regularly being reminded these final hard-fought days before the election,
>is a brutal, messy business, not an antiseptic political science exercise.
>
>  That said, I hereby confess to feeling disappointed over Senator John
>Kerry's failure to home in hard on one of the more worrisome domestic
>policy developments of the past four years - namely the Bush
>administration's drastic expansion of needless government secrecy.
>
>  President Bush's antipathy to open government continues to garner only a
>trivial level of attention compared with the pressing matters that seem to
>be engaging the country at the moment, including, in no particular order,
>the Red Sox, Iraq, terrorism, taxes and the mysterious iPod-size bulge
>visible under the back of Mr. Bush's suit jacket at the first debate. But
>the implications for a second term are ominous.
>
>  Beyond undermining the constitutional system of checks and balances, 
>undue
>secrecy is a proven formula for faulty White House decision-making and
>debilitating scandal. If former President Richard Nixon, the nation's last
>chief executive with a chronic imperial disdain for what Justice Louis
>Brandeis famously called the disinfecting power of sunlight, were alive
>today, I like to think he'd be advising Mr. Bush to choose another role
>model.
>
>  As detailed in a telling new Congressional report, Mr. Bush's secrecy
>obsession - by now a widely recognized hallmark of his presidency - is
>truly out of hand.
>
>  The 90-page report, matter-of-factly titled "Secrecy in the Bush
>Administration," was released with little fanfare in September by
>Representative Henry Waxman of California, the ranking Democrat on the
>House Committee on Government Reform, and one of the most outspoken critics
>of the Bush administration's steady descent into greater and greater
>secrecy. The objective was to catalog the myriad ways that President Bush
>and his appointees have undermined existing laws intended to advance public
>access to information, while taking an expansive view of laws that
>authorize the government to operate in secrecy, or to withhold certain
>information.
>
>  Some of the instances the report cites are better known than others. 
>Among
>the more notorious, of course, are the administration's ongoing refusal to
>disclose contacts between Vice President Dick Cheney's energy task force
>and energy company executives, or to explain the involvement of Mr.
>Cheney's office in the awarding of huge sole-source contracts to
>Halliburton for Iraq reconstruction; the post-9/11 rush to embrace
>shameful, unconstitutional practices like secret detentions and trials; and
>the resistance and delay in turning over key documents sought by the Sept.
>11 commission.
>
>  The report lists many other troubling examples as well. Mr. Bush and his
>appointees have routinely impeded Congress's constitutionally prescribed
>oversight role by denying reasonable requests from senior members of
>Congressional committees for basic information. They forced a court fight
>over access to the Commerce Department's corrected census counts, for
>instance, withheld material relating to the prison abuses at Abu Ghraib and
>stonewalled attempts to collect information on meetings and phone
>conversations between Karl Rove, the presidential adviser, and executives
>of firms in which he owned stock. The administration has also taken to
>treating as top secret documents previously available under the Freedom of
>Information Act - going so far as to reverse the landmark act's presumption
>in favor of disclosure and to encourage agencies to withhold a broad,
>hazily defined universe of "sensitive but unclassified" information.
>
>  Under a phony banner of national security, Mr. Bush has reversed
>reasonable steps by the Clinton administration to narrow the government's
>capacity to classify documents. Aside from being extremely expensive, the
>predictably steep recent increase in decisions to classify information runs
>starkly counter to recommendations of the Sept. 11 commission geared to
>strengthening oversight of the intelligence agencies.
>
>  Not one for self-criticism - or any kind of criticism, for that matter -
>President Bush says he's content to leave it to historians to assess his
>presidential legacy. What he fails to mention is that he has seriously
>impeded that historical review by issuing a 2001 executive order repealing
>the presumption of public access to presidential papers embedded in the
>1978 Presidential Records Act.
>
>On a superficial level, the hush-hush treatment of this issue on the fall
>campaign trail might seem perversely fitting. But Mr. Bush's unilateral
>rollback of laws and practices designed to promote government
>accountability surely rates further scrutiny by voters. We've learned over
>the last four years that what we don't know can hurt us.
>
>--
>-----------------
>R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah at ibuc.com>
>The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
>44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
>"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
>[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
>experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/