Citizen Chics Must Put Out

Tyler Durden camera_lumina at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 21 10:45:19 PDT 2004


OK...so say an officer is at the beach and spots some hot chick in a bathing 
suit, with obviously no ID on her person. And let's say this officer 
"believes" that this chick has a bag of pot at home. Can he just go and 
arrest her?
-TD


>From: Eric Cordian <emc at artifact.psychedelic.net>
>To: cypherpunks at minder.net
>Subject: Citizen Units Must Give Names
>Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
>
>One used to have the right to be known by any name one wished, as long as
>one did not do so for the purpose of committing fraud, or impersonating
>someone else.
>
>One certainly has an absolute right to refuse to speak to a government
>employee when accosted.
>
>So it is difficult to understand the Court's "reasoning" in this case.
>
>http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=domesticNews&storyID=5473543
>
>-----
>
>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday that
>people are required to identify themselves when asked to do so by police,
>and rejected arguments that it violates their constitutional rights to
>privacy and to remain silent.
>
>...
>
>--
>Eric Michael Cordian 0+
>O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
>"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
>

_________________________________________________________________
Watch the online reality show Mixed Messages with a friend and enter to win 
a trip to NY 
http://www.msnmessenger-download.click-url.com/go/onm00200497ave/direct/01/





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list