Power, Propaganda and Conscience in The War On Terror

[Tyler Durden]

As a big, sloppy footnote to this, I'd point out that (these days) anything 
that does not jibe with the current right-wing party line is now called 
"Left", even though there's really not much that is particularly left 
economically (or politically for that matter) in what's said in quotes such 
as below. It seems odd to me that such a wide variety of political views are 
all called "left" simply they don't proclaim the US as savior-to-the-world.

Of course, there are those with fairly leftist views in these ranks, but 
that's not all that relevant. The interesting thing however is that American 
liberalism is now seen as right-wing (in the pro-US policy sense) by 
international "leftists" (meaning international dissidents), indicating it's 
complete and total moral failure.
-TD


>From: Nostradumbass at SAFe-mail.net
>To: cypherpunks at Algebra.COM
>Subject: Power, Propaganda and Conscience in The War On Terror
>Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:14:07 -0500
>
>
>http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=4889&sectionID=40
>
>A view from the left
>
>Excerpts....
>
>"During the height of the cold war, a group of Soviet journalists were 
>taken on an official tour of the United States. They watched TV; they read 
>the newspapers; they listened to debates in Congress. To their 
>astonishment, everything they heard was more or less the same. The news was 
>the same. The opinions were the same, more or less. "How do you do it?" 
>they asked their hosts. "In our country, to achieve this, we throw people 
>in prison; we tear out their fingernails. Here, theres none of that? 
>Whats your secret?"
>.
>.
>.
>""Liberal realism" - in America, Britain, Australia - meant taking the 
>humanity out of the study of nations and viewing the world in terms of its 
>usefulness to western power. This was presented in a self-serving jargon: a 
>masonic-like language in thrall to the dominant power. Typical of the 
>jargon were labels."
>.
>.
>.
>"The difference is that in totalitarian societies, people take for granted 
>that their governments lie to them: that their journalists are mere 
>functionaries, that their academics are quiet and complicit. So people in 
>these countries adjust accordingly. They learn to read between the lines. 
>They rely on a flourishing underground. Their writers and playwrights write 
>coded works, as in Poland and Czechoslovakia during the cold war.
>
>A Czech friend, a novelist, told me; "You in the West are disadvantaged. 
>You have your myths about freedom of information, but you have yet to 
>acquire the skill of deciphering: of reading between the lines. One day, 
>you will need it."
>.
>.
>.
>"In the days before September 11, 2001, when America routinely attacked and 
>terrorised weak states, and the victims were black and brown-skinned people 
>in faraway places like Zaire and Guatemala, there were no headlines saying 
>terrorism. But when the weak attacked the powerful, spectacularly on 
>September 11, suddenly, there was terrorism.
>
>This is not to say that the threat from al-Qaida is not real - It is very 
>real now, thanks to American and British actions in Iraq, and the almost 
>infantile support given by the Howard government. But the most pervasive, 
>clear and present danger is that of which we are told nothing.
>
>It is the danger posed by "our" governments - a danger suppressed by 
>propaganda that casts "the West" as always benign: capable of misjudgment 
>and blunder, yes, but never of high crime. The judgement at Nuremberg takes 
>another view. This is what the judgement says; and remember, these words 
>are the basis for almost 60 years of international law: "To initiate a war 
>of aggression, it is not only an international crime; it is the supreme 
>international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it 
>contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."
>
>In other words, there is no difference, in the principle of the law, 
>between the action of the German regime in the late 1930s and the Americans 
>in 2003. Fuelled by religious fanaticism, a corrupt Americanism and 
>corporate greed, the Bush cabal is pursuing what the military historian 
>Anatol Lieven calls "the classic modern strategy of an endangered 
>right-wing oligarchy, which is to divert discontent into nationalism". 
>Bushs America, he warns, "has become a menace to itself and to mankind."
>

_________________________________________________________________
Check out the new MSN 9 Dial-up  fast & reliable Internet access with prime 
features! http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=dialup/home&ST=1