Optical Tempest FAQ
Sunder
sunder at sunder.net
Thu Dec 2 14:52:26 PST 2004
IMHO, if you light up two or more other identical CRT's and have them
display random junk it should throw enough noise to make it worthless -
(and would put out enough similar RF to mess with RF tempest) there might
be ways to filter the photons from the other monitors out, but, it would
be difficult.
----------------------Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---------------------------
+ ^ + :"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. /|\
\|/ :They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country /\|/\
<--*-->:and our people, and neither do we." -G. W. Bush, 2004.08.05 \/|\/
/|\ : \|/
+ v + : War is Peace, freedom is slavery, Bush is President.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
> Interesting.
> Contrary to what I thought (or what has been discussed here), only a
> 'scalar' of detected light is needed, not a vector. In other words, merely
> measuring overall radiated intensity over time seems to be sufficient to
> recover the message. This means that certain types of diffusive materials
> will not necessarily mitigate against this kind of eavesdropping.
>
> However, his discussion would indicate that the various practical concerns
> and limitations probably limit this to very niche-type applications...I'd
> bet that it's very rare when such a trechnique is both needed as well as
> useful, given the time, the subject and the place.
>
> -TD
>
> >From: Sunder <sunder at sunder.net>
> >To: cypherpunks at al-qaeda.net
> >Subject: Optical Tempest FAQ
> >Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:27:04 -0500 (est)
> >
> >http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/emsec/optical-faq.html
> >
> >Along with tips and examples.
> >
> >Enjoy, and don't use a CRT in the dark. :-)
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list