[IP] One Internet provider's view of FBI's CALEA wiretap push

R. A. Hettinga rah at shipwright.com
Thu Apr 22 14:48:18 PDT 2004


At 4:00 PM -0400 4/22/04, Pete Capelli wrote:
>But the goal isn't to ban it; just marginalize it enough to be able to tar
>it as a terrorist action.
>
>True, there is no worldwide ban on finance.  But there is the delightful
>'know your customer' law.

That's just a monster in the closet.

Fact is, the more people are able to hack insecure networks, the stronger
the crypto gets. At some point, we converge to instantaneous transactions,
and that means stuff like blind signatures. Anything else costs too much.

When we're at bearer transactions, we don't have audit trails anymore...

Right?

:-)

Cheers,
RAH

-- 
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah at ibuc.com>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list