Oregon's proposed new class of terrorists
Tim May
timcmay at got.net
Thu May 22 10:32:23 PDT 2003
Something else that should be mentioned is the _economic analysis_ of
silly proposals like Oregon's to make fairly minor transgressions or
just associations into life sentence felonies:
It costs a _lot_ to imprison a person. A lot per year, a lot over 25
years, and a lot over a life sentence. It costs a lot in direct costs
of operating a prison, it costs a lot in terms of the lost economic
production and taxes of the incarcerated person, and it costs a lot in
terms of intangibles for the society to have prisons filled with
nonviolent, minor convicts.
If local communities had to pay directly for the upkeep of prisoners
things might be different. If a small town with a thousand residents
and maybe 400 tax-paying households had to pay the $150,000 per year
(rough estimate, could be low) to incarcerate Theresa Treehugger, they
might complain to their legislature.
"Yep, we were required to build an extension to our jail to house the
Terrorists from our community. Theresa Treehugger, over there in Annex
B, used to be a programmer down in Silicon Valley. But she joined a
protest march against the logging company, saying they had used
imminent domain to seize a ranch. Someone in the protest dropped a tree
across the Old Redwood Highway, shutting it for 3 hours. We never did
find out who. But all 150 protesters were convicted under the
Protection of the Environment and Safe Forests Act of 2003, so she's
doing life without the possibility of parole in our little prison. We
can't get fire sprinklers for the school cuz of her! And I hear that
Annex B is filled up now and we've got four of those kids from the
community college who participated in a frat party that got out of
control and forced a delay in classes the next day. Yep, they were all
convicted and got life sentences. Now we've got to come up with another
$600,000 a year to deal with _them_!"
(Note that in actual small towns where local criminals actually _are_
incarcerated at town expense, instead of by some nebulous "society
pays" system, it takes a fair amount to incarcerate a person. Drunks
are released after one night in jail, village idiots are just that, and
so on. Even a shoplifter probably ends up doing a few days's worth of
hot, sweaty work on the County road crew and then thinks twice about
whether stealing a pair of sunglasses is worth it. No small town would
dare to incarcerate a college kid or Green Party activist for 25 years
in their own jail for the "crime" of having been at a rally where
someone went too far. The Oregon bill does not give the courts any such
discretion, though, if the law is applied consistently.)
The issue is decoupling costs of the actual from abstract proposals.
California, for example, is building or subcontracting the building of
numerous new prisons: the costs of felonizing more and more behaviors
is not being felt directly. Rather, "everyone pays." A small town would
likely not pay to put a pot smoker in its jail for several years, but
by making the crimes "state" or "Federal" crimes the costs are
transferred and obfuscated.
It's like the familiar example (used by me for many years, independent
of the Wall Street Journal's nearly identical usage some years ago) of
a party going to a restaurant and agreeing to split the check evenly.
Diners are incentivized to order more expensive items, as their
incremental cost is 1/N. Diners who might be trying to save money by
ordering less expensive items find themselves screwed. Net result: the
overall bill goes up. A classic game theory situation. Even worse is
when society pays for the meals, as with health insurance (combination
of subsidized health care and mandatory employer insurance, for
example).
When paying for a choice is decoupled from the choice, mischief occurs.
Market economics 101.
In the case of Oregon's proposed new definition of terrorism and the
draconian sentences intended to be meted out, those making the
proposals and those voting to approve them don't have to _pay_ for
incarcerating college kids and Green Party marchers for the rest of
their lives.
This is the real act of terrorism.
--Tim May
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list