Oregon says unlawful labelling of an MP3 is 'terrorism' (fwd)

[Declan McCullagh]

I glanced at it as well. I do not believe that the bill does what
the Subject: line claims it does (unlawful labeling of music is terrorism).

-Declan


On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 04:34:04AM +0000, Justin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Jim Choate (2003-05-20 23:52Z) wrote:
> 
> > http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9568
> 
> I suppose neither Mr. Rupp nor the Inquirer could be bothered to read
> the bill or the section of Oregon law referenced by it.  Or perhaps
> reading a legislative summary was just too complicated or time-intensive
> for their busy schedules, and they decided to skip that formality in
> their quest to distribute their quota of truth to the public.
> 
> The provisions in Section 3 of the bill, currently in Section 19, Ch.
> 666 of Oregon Laws, are not related to the first part of the bill which
> seems to define terrorism.
> 
> - -- 
> Freedom's untidy, and free people are free to make mistakes and commit
> crimes and do bad things.  They're also free to live their lives and do
> wonderful things.   --Rumsfeld, 2003-04-11
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAj7LAbsACgkQnH0ZJUVoUkM0ZQCfXAgD1+HqG7cTTURFLx2gZWPF
> RQEAoL6x/2H7pTEgaIoZzEfqY71gvlvt
> =FidY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----