Underestimating long-term consequences of cryptoanarchy
Tyler Durden
camera_lumina at hotmail.com
Tue May 6 08:05:44 PDT 2003
Kevin S. vanHorn wrote...
>>Likewise with governments. I still need my trash taken out, and for
>>potholes to be fixed.
>
>
>What makes you think government is needed at all for these? My trash is
>taken out by a private company, not by any government. And privately built
>and maintained roads have existed for a very long time.
Of course. But you've got to read further into my post to see the point.
I'm thinking that in the future, some aspects of government might be
competitive with the private sector to obtain public $$$, much like the US
mail now competes with UPS and FedEx. Like in Stephenson's Snow Crash, many
functions might be opt-in, including possibly war....
For instance, imagine where budget items are voted on directly, and
regularly by voters. Would IraqII have occurred? (I bet not.) (My Jazz
musician brother has suggested that "you should be able to vote any elected
official directly into jail, no questions asked".)
But my point is that heavy crypto will probably have unforseeable effects on
the notion of the state, probably not wipe it out.
-TD
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list