Hippies Banning Smoke

Harmon Seaver hseaver at cybershamanix.com
Fri May 2 17:02:11 PDT 2003


On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 12:25:43PM -0500, jburnes wrote:
> 
> On Friday, May 2, 2003, at 11:03 AM, Harmon Seaver wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 11:21:05AM -0400, Sunder wrote:
> >>What part of "Don't impose your ideals on others" do you not 
> >>understand?
> >
> >   What part of "Don't impose your drug addiction on others" do you not
> >understand? Tobacco junkies are worse than crackheads, especially 
> >concerning
> >their irrational behavior.
> >
> Actually it may be quite rational.

   "Irrational" is what I call junkies so desperate for a fix that they don't
care how it affects anyone else. 

>  A certain percentage of the 
> population may
> be self-medicating for type 2 ADD (nicotine fills in for acetylcholine 
> that they
> lack).  Some others use tobacco to focus and tune out the really high 
> levels
> of environmental noise and distraction that are part and parcel of 
> modern society.
> 
> Some others may do it just because they like it.

   That's their perogative, they just can't force others to indulge along with
them. 

>  Man, cypherpunks has 
> really
> gone down quite a ways when members are advocating who should be allowed
> to consume what and when. Next it will be laws to stop people from 
> blowing their
> noses in restaurants.  I say let people go to hell in their own way.  
> Cigarettes or
> Jack Black or cocaine.


   Oh, another one who either can't read or is just too clueless to get
it. Nobody, but nobody, here has suggested outlawing tobacco (although,
actually, now that I think of it, maybe it should be until such time all other
drugs are freed -- boy, would that be fun to watch all those nic junkies
murdering one another to get a fix). If you'd read the thread, what part of
"forcing others to smoke" don't you understand?



-- 
Harmon Seaver	
CyberShamanix
http://www.cybershamanix.com





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list