Attacking networks using DHCP, DNS - probably kills DNSSEC
Morlock Elloi
morlockelloi at yahoo.com
Mon Jun 30 17:59:00 PDT 2003
> "security", but having both the user and administrator configure a per
> host secret was apparently out of the question.
There is no such thing as "automatic security." That's an oxymoron.
Any system that is "secure" without the ongoing burn of end-user brain cycles
is subject to more-or-less easy subversion [a corollary of this is that
"masses" will never be in situation to be both (1) end users and (2) secure.
One can be a product and secure at the same time without effort, though.]
And any system that (in theory) makes DNS foolproof will inevitably exclude any
parallel name services.
=====
end
(of original message)
Y-a*h*o-o (yes, they scan for this) spam follows:
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list