Maybe It's Snake Oil All the Way Down
Tyler Durden
camera_lumina at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 2 09:30:47 PDT 2003
"Scott Guthery" <sguthery at mobile-mind.com> writes:
> > When I drill down on the many pontifications made by computer
> > security and cryptography experts all I find is given wisdom. Maybe
> > the reason that folks roll their own is because as far as they can see
> > that's what everyone does. Roll your own then whip out your dick and
> > start swinging around just like the experts.
> >
> > Perhaps I'm not looking in the right places. I wade through papers from
> > the various academic cryptography groups, I hit the bibliographies
> > regularly, I watch the newgroups, and I follow the patent literature.
>After
> > you blow the smoke away, there's always an "assume a can opener"
> > assumption. The only thing that really differentiates the experts from
>the
> > naifs is the amount of smoke.
This kind of thinking is similar to the difference between and engineer's
persepective and that of a mathematician or "pure" scientist. Basically, it
might not be bad to consider all crypto systems 'insecure' to some extent.
However, for well-designed cryptosystems the cost of breaking can be made to
scale with the level of security needed.
-TD
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list