curious about covert channels
adam.lydick at verizon.net
Tue Jul 22 17:01:43 PDT 2003
Had a random thought and was curious if anyone had an opinion on this:
Would message-ID, and other realated mail headers that contain
pseudo-random data, make a good covert channel?
Eg: instead of choosing a pseudo-random value for the message ID,
encrypt a block of data of the same length as the ID with a preshared
Issues that spring to mind:
* small, you would need quite a few overt messages to transfer anything
sizeable over the covert channel.
* Is it possible to tell the difference between pseudo-randomly picked
values (typical mail client), encrypted data (depending on algorithm),
and real randomness? (I suppose this could make the channel detectable)
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy