DNA of relative indicts man, cuckolding ignored

Major Variola (ret) mv at cdc.gov
Mon Jul 7 05:14:26 PDT 2003

At 11:58 AM 7/7/03 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
>Major Variola (ret.) wrote:
>> So the possibility of indicting a cuckolded man on the basis
>> of nominal (only) relatives is quite real.
>Only he was convicted because he confessed.

Yes, of course, in this *particular* case.  Which is irrelevent.

The point is that there are undiscussed evidentiary problems using
relatives' DNA,
hinging on the assumption that "blood relatives actually share blood",
in layspeak.

More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list