ATTN: John Walker - RE: [speak-freely] Speak Freely for Windows and Speak Freely mailing lists (fwd)

[Eugen Leitl]

Apart from bugfixes (like a tunable parameter to get rid of UDP buildup in
system buffer due to sample rate skew) there has been some intersting
discussion on tunnelling through NAT. I just noticed that speak-freely@
doesn't have a web archive. I'll be happy to forward relevant posts to
anyone interested (privately, or dump them to cpunx-news to you can read
them up from web archives).

On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Steve Schear wrote:

> I'd love to use SpeakFreely but one of its quirks is that it uses two 
> different ports to initiate and respond to connections and 
> communicate.  Like many others I uses a firewall appliance.  And like many 
> firewall users we find features lacking for configuring our firewalls so 
> that incoming traffic on one port can be associated with outgoing traffic 
> from another.  About two years ago I thought a programmer I knew was going 
> to fix this, but it never happened.  Hint: who ever takes up improving 
> SpeakFreely, please add this to the change list.