Singers jailed for lyrics

Tim May timcmay at got.net
Fri Dec 26 18:55:14 PST 2003


On Dec 26, 2003, at 4:48 PM, Michael Kalus wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>>
>>> The German law clearly defines what is hate speech. It is not an easy
>>> task as you can see in a six month trial.
>>
>> Germany, or any State that  restricts words or thought, needs a regime
>> change
>> with extreme prejudice.
>>
>
> Then I guess you better start liberating the world. Pretty much any
> country in the world has a law against hate speech.

Some do, some don't. The U.S., for all its oft-cited faults, doesn't. 
It's not a violation of any national or state (California) law to argue 
that negroes are monkeys, that Germany's main failure was to miss 
getting the last 100K Jews (the main cause of their problems today, as 
the dreidl-spinners yammer about Nazism while arguing for socialism), 
and so on.

One or two states in the U.S. tried to implement "hate speech" laws, 
but the Supremes, in a rare moment when the negroes and Jews were 
outnumbered, said "Go back and read the First Amendment, you fucking 
dweebs and Hebes."

>
>>> Certain symbols (e.g. Swastika) are forbidden as well.
>>
>> Are there exceptions for Buddhists and Amerinds?  Moron.
>
> All symbols that are related to Nazism. One of the reasons (if not the
> reason) why they banned "Wolfenstein 3D".

You've been brainwashed by your Yid masters. The swastika goes back to 
very, very old Hindu, Buddhist, and Taoist symbology. Hitler read about 
it in some magazine and adopted it as his own.

You make me sick. I hope the ovens are fired up again and you are sent 
to one for a nice, long, _very_ hot shower.

--Tim May





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list