I am anti war. You lot support Saddam

James A. Donald jamesd at echeque.com
Sun Dec 21 19:58:10 PST 2003


    --
James A. Donald:
> > And now the guys on this list are weeping big salt tears 
> > about poor victimized Saddam.

Jamie Lawrence:
> I don't care if he got a shave. I do care that the US fails 
> to adhere to international law.

The US army would be wholly in compliance with international 
law even if it nailed Saddam's head to a post in central 
Baghdad with a nine inch nail.  Saddam is not entitled to POW 
protections.  He was running the war effort out of uniform and 
hidden amongst civilians, which has always been a 
shoot-on-the-spot violation of the rules of war, and his war 
effort consisted largely of terrorist attacks directed at 
civilians, which regrettably has not been a shoot-on-the-spot 
violation, but arguably should be.

> I fail to understand why our "war" on "terrorism", which is 
> apparently the mode that drives most of this sort of feeling, 
> suddenly required knocking over a crippled tyrant.

The title of this thread is 'I am anti war.  You lot support 
Saddam"  I don't defend the war on Iraq.  Why are you 
supporting Saddam?

James A. Donald
> > Anyone who wants to argue that the guys in the two towers 
> > had it coming, and poor Saddam is a victim, puts himself in 
> > the corner with the people who are stupid, evil, and 
> > losers.

Jamie Lawrence:
> Anyone who babbles such inane false relations is a dope.

You have just told us that poor little Saddam is a victim. Care 
to give us your take on the two towers? 

    --digsig
         James A. Donald
     6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
     lSPP/JI5XquWeDE9Luo/hkP7TgMrx6R7x088utoG
     4elBeRSFzJwkpZXIuL3j9uEkywuFYbl8gvR7GYjfN





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list