I am anti war. You lot support Saddam
James A. Donald
jamesd at echeque.com
Sun Dec 21 19:58:10 PST 2003
--
James A. Donald:
> > And now the guys on this list are weeping big salt tears
> > about poor victimized Saddam.
Jamie Lawrence:
> I don't care if he got a shave. I do care that the US fails
> to adhere to international law.
The US army would be wholly in compliance with international
law even if it nailed Saddam's head to a post in central
Baghdad with a nine inch nail. Saddam is not entitled to POW
protections. He was running the war effort out of uniform and
hidden amongst civilians, which has always been a
shoot-on-the-spot violation of the rules of war, and his war
effort consisted largely of terrorist attacks directed at
civilians, which regrettably has not been a shoot-on-the-spot
violation, but arguably should be.
> I fail to understand why our "war" on "terrorism", which is
> apparently the mode that drives most of this sort of feeling,
> suddenly required knocking over a crippled tyrant.
The title of this thread is 'I am anti war. You lot support
Saddam" I don't defend the war on Iraq. Why are you
supporting Saddam?
James A. Donald
> > Anyone who wants to argue that the guys in the two towers
> > had it coming, and poor Saddam is a victim, puts himself in
> > the corner with the people who are stupid, evil, and
> > losers.
Jamie Lawrence:
> Anyone who babbles such inane false relations is a dope.
You have just told us that poor little Saddam is a victim. Care
to give us your take on the two towers?
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
lSPP/JI5XquWeDE9Luo/hkP7TgMrx6R7x088utoG
4elBeRSFzJwkpZXIuL3j9uEkywuFYbl8gvR7GYjfN
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list