U.S. in violation of Geneva convention?

[proclus at gnu-darwin.org]

On 18 Dec, Trei, Peter wrote:
> proclus at gnu-darwin.org wrote:
> 
>>I would like to throw in with the OTO gunners here. [...]
> 
> OTO????
> Ordo Templi Orientalis?
> 
> You don't mean *that*, do you? 

Why not?

> I suspect I'm suffering from acronym overloading. 

I was simply agreeing with the post of Eric Cordian, and hopefully
adding support to the argument, while alluding to his interesting sig.

Regards,
proclus
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/



-- 
Visit proclus realm! http://proclus.tripod.com/
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GMU/S d+@ s: a+ C++++ UBULI++++$ P+ L+++(++++) E--- W++ N- !o K- w--- !O
M++@ V-- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP-- t+++(+) 5+++ X+ R tv-(--)@ b !DI D- G e++++
h--- r+++ y++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

[demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/pgp-signature]