Speaking of Reason
Freematt357 at aol.com
Freematt357 at aol.com
Thu Dec 11 09:07:06 PST 2003
In a message dated 12/11/2003 10:04:04 AM Eastern Standard Time,
declan at well.com writes:
> If that is true, why can't it simply be called "capitalist?"
>
> I suspect because actual capitalists would have some problems with it.
Sterling makes a comment betraying what Ludwig Von Mises called the
anti-capitalist mentality when he quipped to Godwin: "Sure, we hate Exxon because
they're huge and they're everywhere."
Sterling is a capitalist in the same way that Brin is a libertarian. I think
what it is, both are uncomfortable with really labeling what their true
ideology is and therefore feel some need to candy coat their statism.
Regards, Matt Gaylor-
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list