Fake News for Big Brother
Thomas Shaddack
shaddack at ns.arachne.cz
Wed Apr 30 02:09:29 PDT 2003
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Needless to say, nothing could be further from the letter and spirit
> of the First Amendment.
I thought the Constitution applies to personal speech, not to corporate or
government speech...
If I speak for myself, the First Amendment applies.
But should it apply even to corporations? Are such entities considered to
be persons? Should they have "rights"?
I suggest an "eye test". If it is theoretically possible to talk with it
eye-to-eye[1], then the Constitution applies. If it isn't possible to talk
with it without a proxy person - a CEO, a spokesperson, etc. - no "higher
rights" apply.
A non-personal entity should be considered to voluntarily give up its
"right" to existence by an act of knowingly lying. A death penalty - the
entity liquidation - should swiftly follow.
[1] Applies to blind people and people born without eyes as well; the
spirit of what I say should be clear, and whoever would want to nitpick on
such piddly details is a stinkin' lawyer type.
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list