Fake News for Big Brother
Tyler Durden
camera_lumina at hotmail.com
Mon Apr 28 07:40:50 PDT 2003
Well, it might not be such a bad thing in the long run, particularly if they
printed a retraction some days later. Already the masses believe what they
read/hear from "trusted" media sources, even to the point of "knowing" that
Saddam Hussein was somehoe behind 9/11/01. If this were well publicized,
there could be the realiztion of "what!they LIED to us?!"
In the case of the New York Times the lies are not out-and-out lies, but a
deliberate slanting and re-arranging of information in such a way as to
support the 'well-intentioned' initiatives of their perceived community. Or
perhaps worse still, not investigating too closely when our military
releases some 'hot' information...any soft questioning will be done weeks
later and in a page deep in the interior...
Who once raised the point that "in a world where everyone told the truth all
the time, the consequences of a single lie could be catastrophic..."?
-TD
>From: Declan McCullagh <declan at well.com>
>To: Eric Cordian <emc at artifact.psychedelic.net>
>CC: cypherpunks at minder.net
>Subject: Re: Fake News for Big Brother
>Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 23:37:54 -0400
>
>On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 12:04:10PM -0700, Eric Cordian wrote:
> > The news media, will, in fact, print fake news supplied by the
>government,
> > with full knowlege that it is false, to further an ongoing
>investigation.
>
>Yes, that may be the case. It certainly is here. But let's not forget
>the fact that this incident has drawn sharp criticism from other
>journalists.
>
>-Declan
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list