Microsoft on Darknet
Steve Schear
schear at attbi.com
Mon Nov 25 12:51:31 PST 2002
At 09:24 AM 11/25/2002 -0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
>Steve's excellent analysis of how the Network Effect worked against
>Mojo indicates a social-fix for Mojo++, ie: make it easy to get on
>and get content. Ie, get them hooked. They'll at least be autosharing
>stuff they've
>downloaded.
Not really . Mojo is not a file sharing system, its a publication based
distributed file system. Each client mirrors but a small part of the
10**192 chucks of file space. Whether a client downloads content or not is
only indirectly related to the chucks stored on their HD by their
client/broker SW.
>After they're hooked, folks may feel like contributing
>their time/attention to injecting new material, and to get "unlimited"
>access folks will have to contribute. But you have to get them hooked
>first.
And there in lie the problem. Without significantly reducing a user's
effort to publish and/or providing some sort of encouragement to tweak the
content meta-data (Kaaza has recently done that to help address leeching
and hacker attempts to reduce content quality through spoofing and other
tricks).
steve
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list