privacy <> digital rights management
John S. Denker
jsd at monmouth.com
Tue Jun 25 19:21:36 PDT 2002
Dan Geer wrote:
>
> Over the last six months, I'd discovered that Carl Ellison (Intel),
> Joan Feigenbaum (Yale) and I agreed on at least one thing: that the
> problem statements for "privacy" and for "digital rights management"
> were identical,
...
> ... YMMV.
Uhhh, my mileage varies rather considerably. Perhaps we are using
wildly divergent notions of "privacy" -- or wildly divergent
notions of "identical".
DRM has to do mainly with protecting certain rights to _published_
material. Private material is not "identical" with published
material -- it is more opposite than identical.
Private material is, according to the usual definitions, in the hands
of persons who have a common interest in keeping the information
private and restricted. Published material, in contrast, is in the
hands of persons who have no interest in keeping it private, and
indeed commonly have an interest in defeating whatever restrictions
are in place.
We have thousands of years of experience with military crypto, where
the parties at both ends of the conversation are highly motivated to
restrict the flow of private information. The current state of this
technology is very robust.
Ending about 20 years ago we had a 500-year era where it was not
practical for anyone except an established publisher to infringe
copyrights in a big way. During this era, Rights Management had
essentially nothing to do with crypto; it mainly had to do with
the economics of printing presses and radio transmitters, supplemented
by copyright laws that were more-or-less enforceable. This era
was killed by analog means (widespread photocopy machines) and
the corpse was pulverized by digital means (widespread computers
and networking).
I repeat: The main features of our experience with Privacy Management
are disjoint from the main features of our experience with Publishers'
Rights Management. They are about as different as different can be.
The record is replete with spectacular failures attributable to
non-understanding of the difference.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at wasabisystems.com
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list