Snitch jamesd outs himself.

[Jim Choate]

As an operator of one of the nodes, versus somebody who is just a
subscriber, I'll be happy to state that while clearly a waste of anybody
with a clues time the submissions are not distruptive to the list. Nor or
they spam. They are within the charter of cryptography (and related
technologies), civil liberties, and economics. This includes technical
pieces, speculative pieces, opinion pieces, etc.

I've yet to see a threat. A lot of personal opinion and taunts, but no
threat. Got an example? Something like "Kill the President" is not a
threat.

'The' list is unfiltered, individual nodes may be. Your claim we can't
filter him out is specious; we don't want to filter anyone (do you
understand this point yet? Geesh) that's your(!!!) job (I know you don't
get this one).

To attack somebody through their ISP via false claims of abuse for no
reason other than they piss you off is the epitome of chicken shit
behaviour. It's also another excellent example of what hypocrites the
majority of CACL mouthpieces are.


 --
    ____________________________________________________________________

              When I die, I would like to be born again as me.

                                            Hugh Hefner
     ravage at ssz.com                                         www.ssz.com
     jchoate at open-forge.org                          www.open-forge.org

    --------------------------------------------------------------------


On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, matt taylor wrote:

> Do they WANT me to keep changing my address?Do I have to write to every 
> fuckwit I've beaten in debate when I change ISP's.Fucking stalkers,fuck off 
> and die.This just in...
> 
> To: support at nex.net.au Subject: Re: Youth in Asia CC: profrv at nex.com.au
> Someone who appears to be posting from a nex.net.au address
> <profrv at nex.com.au> keeps posting large volumes of spam,
> obcenity, death threats to random people, mail bombs, and so forth
> to our mailing list. He keeps changing his apparent address, so
> we have difficulty filtering him out.
> His postings were originally merely excessive and of doubtful
> relevance, but have become more and more hostile and harassing.
> 
> On 24 Feb 2002, at 5:29, matt taylor wrote:
>  > Youth In Asia Society: At our last monthly meeting, we discussed all of the
>  > reasons there are not to KILL THE PRESIDENT. We think it is our duty to
>  > inform people of our objection to those who believe it is necessary to KILL
>  > THE PRESIDENT. We also object to people who are constantly running around,
>  > shouting, incessantly, "KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE
>  > PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL
>  > THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT!
>  > KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT!" We think that
>  > this is rude. So we would ask you please not to KILL THE PRESIDENT! We
>  > don't want you to KILL THE PRESIDENT! We think it is inadvisable for you to
>  > KILL THE PRESIDENT! We certainly hope that you won't KILL THE PRESIDENT! We
>  > hope that no one you know decides to KILL THE PRESIDENT! We are dedicated
>  > in our efforts to convince people not to KILL THE PRESIDENT! We think that
>  > we will be successful in our efforts to convince people not to KILL THE
>  > PRESIDENT! We don't ask to be thanked for advising people not to KILL THE
>  > PRESIDENT! Nor do we expect to be thanked for advising people not to run
>  > around incessantly screaming "KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL
>  > THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT!
>  > KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE
>  > PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL
>  > THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT!
>  > KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE
>  > PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT! KILL THE PRESIDENT!" That's why we post
>  > anonymously. We're humble.
>  >
> I responded...
> To: jamesd at echeque.com Subject: Re: Youth in Asia Cc: support at nex.net.au
> 
> 
> This particular message is a copy from the archives of this list,not only 
> was it relevant to a recent thread RE list censorship being taken on by 
> self elected list cops but it belongs to a collection I'm gathering for an 
> article I'm planning.
> I'm an entertainment journalist.jamesd is a notorious liar having an entire 
> website devoted to that topic.http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/9879/jamesd.html
> He admits to spending 6 years in Maoist and Trotskyist lying,violent 
> subversive parties,that, I can believe.
> (He is entertaining though) Please 
> don't contribute to the closure of a once vigorous debating forum.Thanks.
> 
> 
>