Highjacker's Banking Problems
Duncan Frissell
frissell at panix.com
Wed Jul 10 08:07:09 PDT 2002
Sept. 11 Hijackers Said to Fake Data on Bank Accounts
Sayeth the New York Times:
July 10, 2002
Sept. 11 Hijackers Said to Fake Data on Bank Accounts
By JAMES RISEN
WASHINGTON, July 9 The Sept. 11 hijackers were able to open
35 American bank accounts without having legitimate Social
Security numbers and opened some of the accounts with
fabricated Social Security numbers that were never checked or
questioned by bank officials, a senior F.B.I. official said
today.
...
With no scrutiny from the financial institutions or
government regulators, the hijackers were able to move
hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Middle East into
the United States through a maze of bank accounts beginning
more than a year before their attacks.
A spokesman for SunTrust, which is based in Atlanta, said the
bank had been cooperating with the F.B.I.'s investigation.
The spokesman said it was possible for foreigners without
Social Security numbers to open bank accounts in this
country, but he could not provide details of what forms of
identification the hijackers used to open the SunTrust
accounts.
...
One of the first signs of a large infusion of cash coming
into the United States for use by the hijackers appears in
bank records dating from 2000, when $100,000 was deposited in
bank accounts controlled by some of the leading hijackers,
including Mr. Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi, Mr. Lormel said.
...
Note that it is as legal as church on a Sunday for non-residents to open
financial accounts in the US or Switzerland or the UK etc. Many US banks
don't accommodate foreigners but that is because of sloth not law.
Certainly online brokers (who are quasi banks) do market to foreigners.
One reason that SS numbers were not verified is that the SSA has
traditionally refused to verify for privacy reasons and the alternative
method involves doing a credit check which takes time and money. And in
the case of non-interest-paying current accounts there are no tax issues.
Banks located in the "red states" are not as bureaucratic as banks in the
"blue states" and have been much slower to adopt the controls popular on
the coasts. This is changing of course but there are still many social
differences which make account transactions easier in the free states.
But let's assume for a moment that Homeland Security shuts the banks down
and requires verified DNA samples and licenses from 10 separate agencies
to open a financial account in the US. So the middle class Egyptians and
Saudis with no criminal records who attacked us are faced with the
ultimate challenge of getting the $500K they needed into the US.
By dint of heroic effort, the future highjackers manage to open bank
accounts in Egypt and Saudi Arabia. They receive ATM, debit, or credit
cards to draw on those accounts. Perhaps they encourage their French or
British co-conspirators to open accounts in those countries. They arrive
in the US and withdraw the $500 to $1000 per day maximum (per account)
from ATM machines. Assume they have only managed to open 5 accounts.
That's $2500 to $5000/day. Or 100 to 200 days to withdraw $500K. Not much
of a trick particularly since they are not limited to 5 accounts and can
get cash advances at any bank with any credit cards they have.
But then Homeland Security outlaws ATMs and credit cards (or at least the
international connections of same). This is tantamount to imposing
exchange controls which the US has never done. So the attackers have to
fall back on Krugerrands. At $333 a pop, they have to get 1500 KRs into
the country. Since bullion coins are not considered currency, they aren't
covered by financial instrument import reporting laws. But you can just
mail them one or two at a time. Most of them will get through. No big
deal.
The truth is that it's a bit tricky to block the movement of small
amounts of money like this.
--
Posted by Duncan Frissell to The Technoptimist at 7/10/2002 10:30:45 AM
Powered by Blogger Pro
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list