Ross's TCPA paper

[Barney Wolff]

My use of "anonym" was a joke.  Sorry if it was too deadpan.  But
my serious point was that if a pseudonym costs nothing to get or
give up, it makes one effectively anonymous, if one so chooses.

On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:37:28AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> R. A. Hettinga wrote:
> > At 12:06 AM +0100 on 7/1/02, Ben Laurie wrote:
> >>No, a pseudonym can be linked to stuff (such as reputation,
> >>publications, money). An anonym cannot.
> > 
> > More to the point, there is no such "thing" as an "anonym", by definition.
> 
> Hmm. So present the appropriate definition?

-- 
Barney Wolff
I never met a computer I didn't like.