Hot Air Jihads.

[mattd]

http://www.onworld.com/MUT/elecGur.html has a declaration which includes
many of the crypto-anarchy concepts.
Found in archives circa 96 and still a valid URL.
ALSO RUSH die
 >Salman Rushdie, in a speech I heard several years ago, said that it was
 >widely doubted that Iran would or could actually come up with the three
 >million dollar bounty on his head.
 >This may play a large part in why he is still around.

A few people who basically seem to oppose my idea ("Assassination Politics")
try to use the Rushdie example as being some sort of "evidence" why it
wouldn't work. ("If Rushdie is alive years later, with a few million on his
head, that proves assassination doesn't work...") I, on the contrary, 
believe that it actually SUPPORTS my theory: Clearly,
nobody has trusted Iran's leadership enough to genuinely believe he would be
able to collect the reward, and thus the apparently size of the reward is
discounted in people's minds. When I respond to these objectors, I point 
out that if Iran was REALLY
serious about expecting to see Rushdie dead, they would have long ago set up
some sort of system, analogous to AsPol, that would allow an anonymous
assassin to kill Rushdie and collect the reward, guaranteed, without risk of
exposure. Clearly, that hasn't happened. (I think we would have heard
about it if it had.) This doesn't make the Iranians any more "civilized,"
obviously, it just means that they are either less competent or trustworthy
about achieving their goals (or are seen to be so), or that they really don't
want to/can't pay anybody the money for Rushdie's death. I don't recall 
every seeing anyone even attempt to contradict this
counter-argument; they always agree that nobody really believes anyone can
safely and reliably collect the Rushdie reward. Needless to say, this
raises serious doubts about the competence of many objectors to critically
analyze the issues in AsPol. It would be interesting to get Rushdie's 
opinion about AsPol.
It's understandable if he had an initial feeling of revulsion about
such a system, on the other hand he should recognize that this system would
also allow opponents of the Iranian government to eliminate those who called
for his death in the first place. It is reasonable to suppose that had this
system been functioning years ago, Iran's government would have been taken
down long ago. >I think all the analyses of the economic costs of 
protecting one person
 >vs. protecting many people are rather beside the point, in light of 
this.<I agree. AsPol will work even if a few people can be protected, 
andprotecting many people is simply not an option.