Mind control: U.S. Measures May Incite Domestic Terror

[citizenQ]

Shit I'm sorry, I left out the "irony smiley" again.

>Citizen Q:
>
>> It's domestic terrorist extremist right wing supremecist group
>> etc.  who will be experience "fear and anger" over the new laws. 
>

(Outraged Irony here)

>> Not "normal" people.  

(Outraged Irony here)

>>Does this mean anyone fearing and angered
>> by the proposed new laws will be a terrorist?
>>
>> Auto - I hope you get a message back to your ranks that we're not
>> going to stand for it and we're not all extremist right wing
>> supremecist terrorists.

Aimee I would have suspected you of enough intelligence to catch the subtlety of intent by simple addition: Subject Line + followon = ironic disgust at the propagandistic spin caliming that only right wing supremacist terrorists are outraged angered, fearful.

Get it?  
BTW, I can't really tell what the fuck you're saying either.

>I most strongly disagree.
>
>Solutions that provoke acts of domestic terrorism, rather than preventing
>them -- are not "solutions," no? While these groups may not hold legitimate
>opinions in the eyes of most Americans, they are legitimate threats. (I have
>used some responsive commentary in here to make this point elsewhere.)
>
>In my opinion, some of these proposals not only "trade security for
>privacy," (their words) they are going to "trade privacy for terrorism." I
>think that's a bad deal for everybody.