Expectation of privacy in public?

jamesd at echeque.com jamesd at echeque.com
Mon Sep 24 20:55:14 PDT 2001


    --
On 24 Sep 2001, at 15:33, georgemw at speakeasy.net wrote:
> It's not a violation of US law for US agents to spy on 
> people in Australia, but it's almost certainly a violation 
> of Australian law.  Similarly, it's probably not a 
> violation of Australian law for Australian agents to 
> eavsdrop on people in California, but it's clearly a 
> violation of California law.

Cypherpunks are not the first to take advantage of 
jurisdictional arbitrage.

The Australian spys have the American spys perform their 
illegal-in-Australia acts for them, and the American spys
have the Australian spys perform their illegal-in-America
acts for them.

I predict you will have some difficulty extraditing an 
Australian spy for spying on people in California. 

    --digsig
         James A. Donald
     6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
     d9TKvFOQiI6PfLbS5xssrICxKXFaqIp0GfM4uOxF
     4YAqO55jeOI2PxqvqPyfaf3wcZlopIZoxG7JqD+hN





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list