resend(SORRY! left out %$#@% subj) RE: Senate votes to permit warrantless Net-wiretaps,

[citizenq at hushmail.com]

You missed the irony, I guess I should have put in the irony-smiley.

Given the overall context of the bill, the debate on the floor, and it's conclusion your report is shrill and Chicken-littleish, which does nothing for creating credible support of resistance to eroding civil liberty. Do your job, support your position, and do it clearly please.  Right now I have no patience for Wired-generation smugness.
  

>On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:11:53PM -0700, citizenQ wrote: > Please
>indicate the wider circumstances, particularly the warrantless
>>circumstances, that this amendment allows cybertapping under, for
>those of us without your time or acumen in editing the existing Title
>III language.
>
>To achieve enlightement, you must consider how this bill amends existing
>wiretap law. This will take some time, it is true, but it is The Path.
>
>-Declan