Official Anonymizing

Aimee Farr aimee.farr at pobox.com
Tue Sep 4 13:45:52 PDT 2001


Are you talking about Gatti? 

~Aimee

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cypherpunks at lne.com [mailto:owner-cypherpunks at lne.com]On
> Behalf Of Steve Schear
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:33 PM
> To: cypherpunks at lne.com
> Subject: Re: Official Anonymizing
> 
> 
> At 01:42 PM 9/4/2001 -0700, John Young wrote:
> >On ZKS selling anonymizing products that are publicly available
> >to governmental officials does raise an issue of whether officials
> >should, or should be able to, conceal their official identities when
> >working cyberspace in an official capacity. I think not, though
> >it might be as impossible to get officials to comply as with
> >terrorists so long as the technology is there.
> 
> I recall reading last week that an Oregon Supreme Court decision makes 
> mandatory that state LE operate only in the clear (no pseudo-anon 
> identities).  Prosecutors are wringing their hands.
> 
> steve





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list