tesla papers

measl at mfn.org measl at mfn.org
Sun Oct 14 15:02:09 PDT 2001



On Sun, 14 Oct 2001, Harmon Seaver wrote:

>        So why are Tesla's papers still classified anyway? I'm not in any
> way arguing Bearden's case, but Tesla did indeed do some pretty
> interesting stuff, and if the government finds a need to keep it secret
> at this point, that seems more than a bit strange. Unless it's simply

I would be willing to bet this stuff is still classified because the
classification reviewer doesn't understand gibberish when [s]he sees it,
and is afraid these "technologies" could wipe out some poor unsuspecting
oil company :-)

> that "once classified, always classified" is their norm, and no one has
> taken the trouble to get them to release the stuff?

This too is no doubt a large part of the problem.  Even with automatic
classification review, there is a strong underlying philosophy of once
secret, always secret.

-- 
Yours, 
J.A. Terranson
sysadmin at mfn.org

If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they
should give serious consideration towards setting a better example:
Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of
unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in
the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and 
elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire
populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate...
This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States
as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers,
associates, or others.  Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of
those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the
first place...
--------------------------------------------------------------------






More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list