More on "new physics"
Tim May
tcmay at got.net
Sun Oct 14 10:40:40 PDT 2001
Someone sent me a private note. I have deleted his name for this public
reply.
> Tim May wrote:
>
>
>> The "new physics" stuff is quite different. It is scorned in a way
>> that plate tectonics was not, and for good reason. Folks should visit
>> Bearden's site. http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/index.html
>
> I did. Oh, dear.
>
> Not sure what is supposed to be denoted by "Tesla physics", but Tesla's
> work with power transmission via HF is fascinating, even if there was
> apparently no practical or safe use for it.
No one disputes the outstanding work Tesla did on a.c. transmission. And
anyone who has seen or used a Tesla coil knows how real it is.
"Tesla physics" is all the cruft that has developed around some of his
more obscure (and late) writings, usually mixed together with stuff
Tesla could not have known about at the time of his death. To wit, the
stuff about zero point energy and perpetual motion machines. And,
sometimes, mixed together with the usual nutcase stuff about the Hollow
Earth theory (zeta reticulans colonizing the hollow earth, Greys,
underground UFO bases, secret Nazi weapons, etc.).
Tesla is a hero to these "new physics" nuts, even though nothing Tesla
ever worked on or built contradicts in the slightest way the predictions
of Maxwell's theories. They take Tesla's very real contributions and
some of his weirder theories (though none of them so weird as the Hollow
Earth/antigravity/time reversal theories of modern nutters) and say that
this means "They laughed at Tesla, they laugh at me!"
BTW, I was/am an early ("angel") investor in a company doing work on
ultrawideband transmissions. Some of the works Bearden cites, like those
of Barrett, are familiar to me and others with this company. Saying that
there is a role for ultrawideband pulse technology, a la spread spectrum
and beyond SS, is NOT the same as saying there are confirmed "problems"
with electromagnetic theory. There may be, and there are a handful of
folks doing "foundational" work in E&M, but, so far, there are no
indications that their foundational work is changing any engineering
calculations. Quite the contrary, in my view. Electromagnetic theory
basically "works"--to many decimal places of accuracy. Circuits work as
expected, antennas work as expected, and there are no "unexplained
observations" (as usually exist before a new theory arrives). There may
be some _semantic_ issues, e.g., does a square wave or impulse "really"
have components that were sent out _before_ the square wave or impulse?
(A Fourier decomposition of a square wave starting at time t = 0 has
"sine wave components" spread out over time and adding up in such a way
as to give the square wave, or the impulse, or any other signal. Some
think this means deep and mysterious things are happening, something
having to do with time travel and reversing the aging process, blah blah
blah.
Henning Harmuth may write fairly eloquently about the "dogma of the
circle" and how the Fourier decomposition of a signal into (allegedly)
a near-infinite series of sine waves is "not real," but for all intents
and purposes it all works. And the "new physics" people like Bearden go
way beyond what Harmuth and Barrett are talking about: they bring in
"curved space-time" and gravitation and antigravity and the ultra-weird
notion that aging can be reversed by "pumping the conjugate time-axis of
the Minkowski manifold" (OK, I made this up...don't have time to lift
one of Bearden's direct quotes...and this will help train me in the
jargon if I ever become a "new physicist.").
Nut cases like Bearden have the patter of physics down. Very few actual
physicists waste their time dissecting and refuting Bearden for obvious
reasons.
I urge readers of this list not to waste time on this stuff.
--Tim May, Citizen-unit of of the once free United States
" The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood
of patriots & tyrants. "--Thomas Jefferson, 1787
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list