Feingold amendment text URL (was Re: CDT: congressional action call - before Friday morning, October 12, 2001)

Declan McCullagh declan at well.com
Thu Oct 11 12:23:24 PDT 2001


Michael,

Indeed you guys were (and are) on top of things. But the factsheet
(http://www.cdt.org/security/011011feingoldfactsheet.shtml) has
been deleted.

-Declan


On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 11:57:57AM -0400, Michael Clark wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> We were on the case. But we did not get a postable copy of the text 
> until Thursday morning and it was posted on our site.
> 
> A fact sheet on Sen. Feingold's amendments is now available at 
> http://www.cdt.org/security/011011feingoldfactsheet.shtml
> 
> You can also find out who your Senators are at CDT's site at 
> http://www.cdt.org/action/feingold/ or 
> http://www.cdt.org/action/contactcongress.shml Michael
> 
> >I would -prefer- to read the text for myself too, and I'm pissed off 
> >at CDT, EFF, Congressional Record, and you for that matter, for not 
> >being on the case earlier.  If it came down to it I think I'd trust 
> >CDT EFF et. al. enough -it's not like trusting Ashcroft or Shrub- 
> >but of course you're right.
> >
> >The amendment text is at
> >http://www.cdt.org/security/011011s1510feingold.pdf
> >
> >
> >  >
> >  > CDT is on the right track, but I'd be hesitant to call my senators and
> >  > endorse Feingold's amendments until I knew what they said. The CDT
> >  > alert is silent on details. That's a shame, since they could have
> >  > easily included a summary of the amendments (which I really will put
> >  > online soon, along with their text).
> >  >
> >  > -Declan
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 11:14:37PM -0700, citizenQ wrote:
> >  > > Dear Activist:
> >  > >
> >  > > Things are moving very fast on Capitol Hill.  Legislation to expand
> >  > > government surveillance will be considered by the Senate (and
> >  > > maybe the House) on Thursday, October 11.
> >  > >
> >  > > In the Senate, Sen. Russ Feingold is planning to offer amendments
> >  > > Thursday morning that will address some of the privacy concerns
> >  > > raised by the pending bills, by requiring government surveillance to
> >  > > be more focused and subject to meaningful judicial controls.  CDT
> >  > > supports the Feingold amendments.
> >  > >
> >  > > You can make a difference. Call your Senators in Washington right
> >  > > away and let them know that you think civil liberties should be part of
> >  > > the balance as we move forward to protect our country from terrorism.
> >  > > Urge them to support the Feingold privacy amendments
> >  > >
> >  > > BACKGROUND
> >  > >
> >  > > Following the horrendous attacks of September 11, it is clear that US
> >  > > anti-terrorism efforts need to be improved.  Unfortunately, there has
> >  > > been little time to develop a response that is effective and does not
> >  > > unnecessarily infringe civil liberties.  Legislation moving quickly
> >  > > through Congress involves some fundamental changes in the
> >  > > surveillance laws.  Most of the changes are not limited to terrorism
> >  > > cases, but concern all crimes and all intelligence investigations.
> >  > >
> >  > > Among other things, the bills would:
> >  > >
> >  > > * Allow FBI to seize any and all stored records (medical records,
> >  > > educational records, stored e-mail) in intelligence cases without a
> >  > > search warrant.
> >  > >
> >  > > * Allow computer system operators to authorize government
> >  > > surveillance without a court order (the computer trespasser
> >  > > provision).
> >  > >
> >  > > * Authorize roving taps in intelligence cases without clear guidelines,
> >  > > allowing government to monitor pay phones, library computers, cell
> >  > > phones without first determining who is using the device.
> >  > >
> >  > > * Allow secret searches (searches without notice at the time of the
> >  > > search) in all criminal cases.
> >  > >
> >  > > * Extend government surveillance under minimal standards to broad
> >  > > categories of Internet data  - all "routing, addressing and signaling
> >  > > information" (the "pen register" provision).
> >  > >
> >  > > For full background the current civil liberties issues with the bill,
> >  > > please see CDT's latest policy post --
> >  > > http://www.cdt.org/publications/pp_7.10.shtml
> >  > >
> >  > > Also, the New York Times on October 10 explained the current
> >  > > situation in the Senate and Sen Feingold's concerns--
> >  > > http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/10/national/10RIGH.html
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > WHAT YOU CAN DO--MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD
> >  > >
> >  > > 1. Call your your Senators
> >  > >
> >  > > [www.vote-smart.org can tell you who your sens are (duh)]
> >  > >
> >  > > Tell the person who answers the phone that you hope your Senator
> >  > > will support the Feingold privacy amendment to the terrorism bill, so
> >  > > that it adequately protects civil liberties when giving the government
> >  > > new surveillance powers.
> >  > >
> >  > > Use these words if you feel tongue-tied:
> >  > >
> >  > > Staffer: Hello, Sen. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX office.
> >  > >
> >  > > You: Hello.  I'm a constituent calling to urge the Senator to support the
> >  > > Feingold privacy amendments to the anti-terrorism bill. Government
> >  > > needs to fight terrorism, but the bill fails to protect privacy.  I'm
> >  > > concerned about the provisions on Internet surveillance and roving
> >  > > wiretaps.  I support the Feingold amendments setting clear limits on
> >  > > government surveillance.
> >  > >
> >  > > Staffer: I'll tell the Senator.  Thanks, bye!
> >  > >
> >  > > 2. Let CDT know how it went! Go to
> >  > >    http://www.cdt.org/action/feedback.cgi?membid=casr
> >  > >    and use the feedback form to tell us what happened. Or you can
> >  > >    send an email back to me at mclark at cdt.org.
> >  > >
> >  > > 3. Lastly, please forward this message to other individuals interested
> >  > >    in protecting privacy and free expression on the Internet. They can
> >  > >    find information about their Senators at http://www.cdt.org/action/.
> >  > >    But they need to act right away. Forward this message until
> >  > >    Friday morning, October 12, 2001.
> >  > >
> >  > > PLEASE NOTE:  We are asking you to call your Senators in
> >  > > Washington because studies have shown that this is the most
> >  > > effective way to make a difference over a short period of time.  By the
> >  > > time the office reads your email or letter it will probably be too late
> >  > > and a call into the district office does not have the same impact when
> >  > > the Senator is in Washington.
> >  > >
> >  > > --
> >  > > To subscribe to CDT's Activist Network, sign up at:
> >  > >   http://www.cdt.org/join/
> >  > >
> >  > > If you ever wish to remove yourself from the list, unsubscribe at:
> >  > >   http://www.cdt.org/action/unsubscribe.shtml
> >  > >
> >  > > If you just want to change your address, you should unsubscribe
> >  > > yourself and then sign up again or contact: mclark at cdt.org
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Clark, Webmaster
> Center for Democracy and Technology
> 1634 Eye Street NW, Suite 1100    Washington, DC 20006
> voice: 202-637-9800    fax: 202-637-0968
> mclark at cdt.org         http://www.cdt.org/
> PGP Key available on keyservers
> 
> Join our Activist Network! Your participation can make a difference!
> http://www.cdt.org/join/





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list