RIAA secret meeting memo fake

John Young jya at pipeline.com
Wed Oct 10 09:55:21 PDT 2001


We're pursuing the matter though Tony Smith at the Register
seems to be washing his hands of it. And we have asked a couple
of wizards help check out the source of the messages we have
received, now two -- the latest last evening (with a possibility
the source is a provocateur of the infotainment industry aiming
for sympathy legislation).

Here's our latest message to our always trustworthy source:

-----

Response to your message last evening:

The Register has today recanted its story about the RIAA meeting.

How do you want to handle this now? Ready to be named,
your full messages published on Cryptome, or do you want
to provide substantiation for your messages and keep your
identity concealed? Or perhaps another thoughtful approach
to loft this story to a higher level. Interest will be high for a few
more hours -- or many days if you come through with authentic 
evidence. Want to talk on the phone, be on TV with a mask, 
then fax us your meeting notes for one of the prime participants, 
provide proof of employment with a media corporation. All as 
easily done as this message.

John
Tel: 212-873-8700
Fax: 212-787-6102

-----

We get sucker punched occasionally and don't mind for it allows
respondents to critique and smoke out phonies, which has long
been big business, name your titans of fakery in all fields, not
least entertainment, media, gov, mil and intel.

Indeed, without sophisticated fakery, deception, disinformation,
lying, cheating, exploitation of the yokels, lying about the truth, 
this list would have little reason to exist, not to say a huge swatch 
of the globe's economy, led, yes, yes, by the USA USA.

Valenti claims the interests of the USA USA are identical to MPAA
MPAA, and why not RIAA RIAA and the supplicants for billions
like NY NY.





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list