A reasonable editorial assessment of Afghanistan status.
"Jürgen A. Erhard"
jae at jerhard.org
Tue Nov 6 19:27:34 PST 2001
>>>>> "jamesd" == jamesd <jamesd at echeque.com> writes:
jamesd> --
>> http://www.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/11/01/column.billpress/
>> index.html In each case, the truth belies the praise. If
>> the military's doing such a great job, why -- after three
>> weeks of nonstop, intensive bombing of one of the poorest
>> countries on earth, with no navy, no air force and only a
>> ragtag band of soldiers using obsolete weapons -- is the
>> Taliban still in power?
<conspiracy-mongering/Maybe because that's not really what this war is
about?/
jamesd> In past wars, CNN has been rather accurately called
jamesd> "Communist News Network", but in this war they seem
jamesd> incapable of mentioning the fact that our armed forces
jamesd> frequently fuck up.
Hey, since the day I heard they tried to get Rush Limbaugh, I've given
up on them. And since all they're showing is "War War WAR", I've
given up watching.
Bye, J
--
Jürgen A. Erhard (juergen.erhard at gmx.net, jae at users.sf.net)
My WebHome: http://jerhard.org
GNU Privacy Guard (http://www.gnupg.org)
Join the War on the War on Drugs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks-legacy/attachments/20011107/b9d28b9f/attachment.sig>
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list