[CNN] FBI: Threat against Western bridges 'not credible'

[mmotyka at lsil.com]

"A. Melon" <juicy at melontraffickers.com> wrote :
>
>WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The information that prompted a warning that 
>terrorists might target a major Western bridge has been determined to be 
>"not credible," two federal law enforcement officials tell CNN, and the 
>FBI Tuesday is preparing to say no threat exists. 
> 
>"There just wasn't anything to it," said one official. 
>
>A second official agreed, and says local law enforcement agencies are 
>about to be notified of that conclusion. 
>
>[...]
>
>>From http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/11/06/inv.bridge.threat/index.html
>
>Snort. What are the chances that the National Guard remains on patrol at 
>the bridges "in the interest of safety"?
>
Like it mattered at all that they were there? Except for the superficial
effect of comforting the poor scared sheep I didn't see anything
effective, I didn't see anyone searching trucks or opening car trunks.
Form over function. Same as airport security. Psyops. Like the warnings
to keep people off balance. Should we start a pool to see who can guess
when ashcruft will put everyone 'on highest alert' next? It'll probably
line up with an ACLU attack on the USAmaPATriarchalRIOT act. Only a
commie traitor could object to le power grabs at a time when alerts are
clearly critical to the survival of the entire nation and its way of
life!