Proving security protocols (fwd)

Jim Choate ravage at ssz.com
Sat Nov 3 08:30:48 PST 2001



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 18:15:47 +1300 (NZDT)
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz>
To: bmukherj at styx.uwaterloo.ca, cryptography at wasabisystems.com,
    rick_smith at securecomputing.com
Subject: Re: Proving security protocols

Rick Smith at Secure Computing <rick_smith at securecomputing.com> writes:
>At 09:00 AM 11/1/2001, Roop Mukherjee wrote:
>>Can someone offer some criticism of the practice formal verification in
>>general ?
>Okay, I'll grab this hot potato.

I may as well speak up as well then... I spent most of a chapter of my thesis
looking at formal security verification in fairly exhaustive detail (if I
missed anything I'm sure I'll hear about it soon :-).  You can get it as
http://www.cryptoapps.com/~peter/04_verif_techniques.pdf.  The conclusion is
that there are more effective ways to spend your time and money, but for the
full story I'd recommend you read the above document.

Peter.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at wasabisystems.com





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list