[Re: content owners vs. ISPs]
LUIS VILDOSOLA
lvild at usa.net
Mon Mar 19 11:13:58 PST 2001
Every station an ISP, 1++ vote
Ray Dillinger <bear at sonic.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
>
> >
> >900MHz packet (<$100/site) coupled with Plan 9 is the base you want to
> >start from using current tech. It will require updating firewall software
> >so that it also handles bandwidth throttling and fail-over routing.
>
>
> I've looked at that, but I'm unsure about it... the problem is that
> if not enough people have it you're out of range - but if too many
> people have it, you're choked for bandwidth and get interference
> problems.
>
> With a range of a few hundred feet to a few miles, routing can also
> become problematic.
>
> It would be nice though: a $100 'packet box' for each station, that
> allows you to set up independent IP connections with your neighbors.
> If you can get them common enough, it would be impossible to cut
> someone off by cutting their ISP access -- 'cause out in the wild,
> a packet is a packet is a packet, and if all the stations run IP
> protocol, even if every ISP in the world rejects a packet, it could
> still make its way across any continent in short hops from station
> to station.
>
> And this is not just an anti-censorship thing, either; this is
> more properly a tool for 24/7 uptime for people who can't afford
> t3's and can't get PacBell's attention to fix their damn line in
> the first minute after it goes down. I can picture that sales
> pitch appealing to a lot of home businesses who get cut off from
> their DSL connection for a week at a time while PacBell pulls its
> head out of its collective ass. Or Cinci Bell, or Southern Bell,
> or NTT, or Deutsche Telecomm, or whoever serves their area.
>
> I like it. Every station an ISP.
>
> Bear
>
>
____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list